Stakeholder Management

• Stakeholder Management is the practice of identifying, understanding, and strategically engaging people who influence or are affected by your design work. • Effective management prevents late-stage derailment and builds organizational support for UX. • Map stakeholders by influence and interest, then tailor your engagement approach to each quadrant.

stellae.design

Strategy

Stakeholder Management in UX involves systematically identifying everyone who has influence over or is affected by design decisions, understanding their goals and concerns, and engaging them appropriately throughout the design process. Using tools like the Power/Interest Grid (Mendelow, 1991), UX practitioners categorize stakeholders and develop communication strategies for each group. Strong stakeholder management is often the difference between a brilliant design that ships and one that dies in committee.

Why It Matters

Every design decision exists within a web of organizational interests — engineering capacity, business goals, executive vision, and user needs rarely align automatically. Effective stakeholder management ensures that design work survives contact with organizational reality by building alignment before conflict arises. Without it, even brilliant design solutions get derailed by last-minute executive overrides, misaligned priorities, or teams working from different assumptions.

Real-World Examples

Spotify's Squad Model for Cross-Functional Alignment

Spotify organizes teams into squads where design, engineering, and product stakeholders work together daily on shared objectives. This structure reduces handoff friction and ensures stakeholder input is continuous rather than concentrated in approval gates. The model keeps all parties aligned through ongoing collaboration rather than periodic presentations.

Design Sprints with Executive Participation

Google Ventures' design sprint format includes a structured decider role for the most senior stakeholder, giving them meaningful input within a time-boxed process. By involving executives in the sprint rather than presenting results afterward, the process builds buy-in through participation. The sprint's rigid structure prevents scope creep and opinion loops that typically derail stakeholder reviews.

Counter-example

Big Reveal Presentation After Months of Isolated Design Work

A design team spends three months working in isolation then presents a comprehensive redesign to stakeholders for the first time in an all-hands meeting. Stakeholders feel blindsided by major changes they had no input on, leading to defensive reactions and wholesale rejection of the work. The lack of incremental alignment turns what could have been collaborative refinement into adversarial negotiation.

Role-Specific Guidance

Common Mistakes

• The most damaging mistake is treating stakeholder management as a one-time activity — alignment requires continuous maintenance, not a single kickoff meeting. Teams also frequently manage up (executives) while neglecting lateral stakeholders (engineering leads, customer support, marketing) whose buy-in is equally critical for successful implementation. Another common error is confusing stakeholder management with stakeholder appeasement — incorporating every piece of feedback without filtering it through user evidence dilutes design quality.