Inclusive Language

Inclusive language is writing that avoids expressions, assumptions, or terms that exclude or marginalize groups of people. In UX, this covers gender-neutral language, accessibility-aware phrasing, cultural sensitivity, and avoiding stereotypes in examples and illustrations.

stellae.design

Design Principles

Inclusive language goes beyond political correctness — it's about ensuring your product works for all users. Language that assumes a user's gender, ability, cultural background, or technical expertise creates invisible barriers.

Before/after examples: • Before: 'Hey guys!' → After: 'Hey everyone!' or 'Hey team!' • Before: 'Blacklist/Whitelist' → After: 'Blocklist/Allowlist' • Before: 'Master/Slave' → After: 'Primary/Replica' or 'Main/Secondary' • Before: 'Sanity check' → After: 'Confidence check' or 'Quick review' • Before: 'He can manage his account...' → After: 'They can manage their account...'

Why It Matters

Inclusive language is the deliberate choice of words, phrases, and communication patterns that avoid excluding, marginalizing, or offending people based on their identity — including gender, race, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status — and in digital products, it is foundational because language is the primary medium through which interfaces communicate intent, build trust, and signal who belongs. When product copy uses gendered defaults like 'he' for all users, ableist metaphors like 'blind spot' in professional contexts, or culturally narrow references, it sends an implicit message to affected users that the product was not designed with them in mind, eroding trust and creating a sense of exclusion that no visual design polish can compensate for. Inclusive language is not political correctness but professional communication quality — it widens the audience that feels welcomed, reduces support friction from confused or offended users, and protects the brand from reputational risk in an era where screenshots of insensitive copy travel instantly across social media.

Real-World Examples

Slack's inclusive default messaging

Slack's interface copy consistently uses gender-neutral language, avoids cultural idioms, and writes in clear, simple sentences that work for a global user base spanning dozens of languages and cultures. System messages say 'someone is typing' rather than 'he is typing,' and onboarding copy welcomes 'your team' rather than making assumptions about organizational structure or hierarchy. This consistent attention to inclusive language has helped Slack become a default communication tool across cultures and industries where previous tools felt implicitly oriented toward English-speaking Western users.

Microsoft's inclusive writing guidelines

Microsoft published comprehensive bias-free writing guidelines that cover gender, disability, race, age, and socioeconomic status, and integrated these guidelines into their editorial review process for all product surfaces from Windows to Azure documentation. The guidelines provide specific alternatives — 'master/slave' becomes 'primary/replica,' 'whitelist/blacklist' becomes 'allowlist/blocklist,' and 'sanity check' becomes 'validation check' — making it easy for writers and developers to adopt inclusive patterns without guessing. This systematic approach ensures that inclusive language is not dependent on individual awareness but embedded in the organizational writing process.

Counter-example

Health app with binary-only gender options

A health and fitness application requires users to select either 'Male' or 'Female' during onboarding with no alternative option, skip capability, or explanation of why the data is needed, immediately alienating non-binary and intersex users who find that the first interaction with the product denies their identity. The app then uses the selected gender to pepper the interface with gendered language — 'Great job, girl!' or 'Keep pushing, man!' — in motivational messages that feel patronizing even to users who fit the binary options and exclusionary to those who do not. User reviews consistently cite the rigid gender model as a reason for uninstalling, demonstrating that a single exclusionary design decision in onboarding can overshadow an otherwise well-built product.

Role-Specific Guidance

Common Mistakes

• The most common mistake is treating inclusive language as a one-time audit rather than an ongoing practice — teams clean up copy once, declare victory, and then allow new exclusionary patterns to creep in through feature copy, error messages, and marketing content that bypasses the original guidelines. Another frequent error is overcorrecting with awkward or clinical language that avoids offense but also avoids warmth, readability, and human connection — the goal is natural, respectful communication, not sterile corporate speak that strips all personality from the product voice. Teams also commonly focus on English-language inclusivity while ignoring that their product is used in languages with grammatical gender, honorific systems, or cultural norms that require entirely different inclusive language strategies, making localization an afterthought rather than a core part of the inclusive language effort.